If you look at the laws of conservation, modern physics, Native American Spirituality, The Vedas, Taosim, Heraclitus' Logos, Plato's Demiurge, look at the evidence of Neanderthal Burials since 30,000 years before our species of humanity appeared, look at the FACTS, you're choosing either disbelief due to argument of silence or appealing to belief in spite of no evidence and the fact is absence of evidence does not automatically translate to absence of evidence..

I figured out in a way we do "reincarnate" as part of the evolution of the universe due to how when we rot into the ground we become new life forms and how everything we were born with that forged our "consciousness" gets recycled into new life, we'll live again, we just won't know it.

Now when it comes to the hypothetical "soul" there is no evidence one way or another.

We all come from the same basic elements, so we're all connected in that sense, but our configurations and the laws of nature allowed us individuality, which is why collectivism and individualism are both kinda shitty in spite of their good points.

If I were not an agnostic deist, I'd be an apathetic agnostic, but with what we observe, in a way we already do reincarnate, but in a spiritual sense we don't know unless you say "the soul and bodies are one and the same" and duality ceases and then it becomes a little easier to understand since our "souls" are made up of our consciousness(Tesla WON THAT ROUND BEEYATCH!!), so in a nutshell this is my view and if people researched in the same ways and same paths, many more could come to the same conclusion, I hypothesize anyways.